EV Engineering & Infrastructure

  • News
  • Articles
    • Q&As
    • Tech Spotlight
  • Batteries
  • Charging
    • Wireless Charging
    • Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G)
  • Electrification
  • Testing and Safety
  • Learn
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Toolboxes
    • Webinars
  • Resources
    • Digital Editions
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Voices
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

UL Solutions opens battery enclosure material screening lab to advance EV safety

By Michelle Froese | May 30, 2024

UL Solutions, a global provider of applied safety science, announced it opened a new battery enclosure material screening (BEMS) laboratory in Ise, Mie, Japan, to help automotive manufacturers and their suppliers safely compare the performance of various materials to enhance electric vehicle (EV) battery safety.

Battery enclosures help protect EV occupants, and the materials the enclosures are made of play a critical safety role in case of a battery fire or what is known as a thermal runaway event.

As the second UL Solutions facility with BEMS testing capabilities, following the company’s headquarters in Northbrook, Illinois, the UL Solutions Ise BEMS Laboratory is anticipated to help regional customers accelerate battery enclosure research and development and bring safer batteries to market.

EV batteries typically cover the entire base of a vehicle. Materials used to house these batteries must be tested to determine their ability to withstand thermal runaway stresses. Thermal runaway is a chain reaction that can occur in lithium-ion batteries when the internal temperature of a battery cell reaches a critical level. It can produce fire, smoke and extremely high temperatures.

UL Solutions’ BEMS offerings evaluate the performance of battery enclosure materials in a thermal runaway event, outlined under UL 2596, the Standard for Test Method for Thermal and Mechanical Performance of Battery Enclosure Materials.

The new UL Solutions BEMS laboratory is expected to help the automotive industry protect EV occupants with capabilities to conduct UL Solutions Battery Enclosure Thermal Runaway (BETR) evaluations and employ the UL Solutions Torch and Grit (TaG) test method.

  • BETR evaluates material performance by simulating a thermal runaway scenario. The evaluations entail testing material plaques versus the entire battery assembly using lithium-ion battery cells (18650 type), reducing testing costs and development time for resin manufacturers and material suppliers.
  • TaG incorporates small-scale testing and simulates high temperatures and mechanical impact stresses in a battery thermal runaway event, and ranks materials for battery enclosures.

The opening of this new testing facility in Ise is part of UL Solutions’ expansion of its mobility and new energy technology facilities in Japan. The Ise Campus is home to laboratories for safety, EMC, reliability testing, and large mobility, as well as the CHAdeMO EV-Quick Charger Matching Center.

“Manufacturers in the automotive industry are investing in researching and developing lighter batteries to extend electric vehicle range and stay competitive while keeping occupant safety at the forefront,” said Hidehiko Yamajo, regional VP of Japan at UL Solutions. “We believe our new laboratory in Japan is well-positioned to meet the needs of global manufacturers and help them navigate complex challenges and shape the future of mobility.”

You might also like


Filed Under: Batteries, Technology News
Tagged With: ulsolutions
 

Next Article

← Previous Article
Next Article →


 
“ee
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for EV professionals.

Tech Spotlight

  • Why deterministic testing matters in high-voltage EV systems
  • Inductive charging is moving from roadways to driveways
More Tech Spotlight

Featured Contributions

  • How AI Is accelerating atomistic simulation for EV battery materials
  • Q&A: Addressing engineering challenges in high-voltage EV power architectures
  • What is the role of engineering coatings in EVs?
  • Part II: Why it’s important to be wary of “platform” and “modular” architectures
  • Q&A: How EV constraints are reshaping software-defined vehicle architectures
More Featured Contributions

EV TECH TOOLBOX

“ee
Explore the EV Engineering Tech Toolboxes: a collection of high-impact articles that break down the latest EV design trends and technologies. Download to stay aligned with today’s evolving EV design challenges.

Learning Center

EE Learning Center

Sponsored Content

  • Converting custom materials for EV applications
  • Advantech Powers Versatile Electric Vehicle Charging Systems

EV Training Days

ev
Q&A
EV Engineering & Infrastructure
  • 5G Technology
  • Analog IC Tips
  • Battery Power Tips
  • Connector Tips
  • EDABoard Forums
  • Electro-Tech-Online Forums
  • Engineer’s Garage
  • Microcontroller Tips
  • Power Electronic Tips
  • Sensor Tips
  • Test and Measurement Tips
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search EV Engineering & Infrastructure

  • News
  • Articles
    • Q&As
    • Tech Spotlight
  • Batteries
  • Charging
    • Wireless Charging
    • Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G)
  • Electrification
  • Testing and Safety
  • Learn
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Toolboxes
    • Webinars
  • Resources
    • Digital Editions
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Voices
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe