EV Engineering & Infrastructure

  • News
  • Articles
    • Q&As
    • Tech Spotlight
  • Batteries
  • Charging
    • Wireless Charging
    • Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G)
  • Electrification
  • Testing and Safety
  • Learn
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Toolboxes
    • Webinars
  • Resources
    • Digital Editions
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Voices
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

New battery architecture uses module bypassing to improve EV drivetrain efficiency

By Michelle Froese | August 24, 2026

Researchers at the University of Birmingham have developed a modular electric vehicle (EV) battery architecture that uses solid-state switches to selectively connect or bypass individual battery modules.

The approach is designed to address two challenges within the electric drivetrain: voltage and state-of-charge imbalance between battery modules, and power losses associated with supplying the traction inverter from a fixed dc-link voltage.

The proposed modular battery pack uses a bypass topology to provide a variable dc-link voltage to the traction inverter while balancing battery modules. (Image: Ashraf et al., Journal of Energy Storage, CC BY | ScienceDirect)

In the proposed architecture, each battery module uses two MOSFETs. One connects the module during normal operation, while the second bypasses it. The battery management system determines how many modules are required based on the voltage demand from the traction motor.

At lower motor speeds, modules that are not needed can be bypassed, reducing the dc-link voltage supplied to the traction inverter. The researchers say this allows the system to vary the dc-link voltage without requiring an additional dc/dc converter.

Key findings from the research include:

  • A voltage-based balancing controller reduced an initial 30% state-of-charge imbalance to a residual imbalance of less than 1%.
  • The controller uses measured module voltage rather than requiring precise state-of-charge calculations for each module.
  • Selective module bypassing provides a variable dc-link voltage without an additional dc/dc converter.
  • Testing using the WLTP-3 driving cycle showed an approximately 40% reduction in overall system power loss compared with the fixed dc-link configuration.
  • Traction inverter efficiency increased from 96.5% to 98.0% under the tested conditions.
  • The architecture was validated using a hardware-in-the-loop setup with a real microcontroller.

The voltage-based balancing strategy also reduces the need for separate active or passive balancing circuitry. Rather than transferring energy between modules or dissipating excess energy through resistors, the controller selects modules according to their voltage while meeting the traction system’s requested dc-link voltage.

The researchers identified limitations to the approach. Voltage alone becomes a less reliable indicator of state of charge for battery chemistries with extended flat voltage regions. Balancing capability is also reduced above the motor’s base speed because all of the battery modules must be connected in series to provide the higher dc-link voltage required by the traction system.

The research was conducted by Adnan Ashraf, Basit Ali, Mothanna S.A. Alsunjury, Paul Weston and Pietro Tricoli from the University of Birmingham’s Department of Electronic, Electrical and Systems Engineering. The study was published in the Journal of Energy Storage.

Resource

Ashraf, A., et al. “EV battery management system with integrated bypass switching matrix for voltage/SOC balancing and traction inverter loss minimisation.” Journal of Energy Storage, 2026. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X26023479

You might also like


Filed Under: Batteries, Power Electronics, Technology News
Tagged With: batteries, drivetrain, powerelectronics, research, universityofbirmingham
 

Next Article

← Previous Article
Next Article →


 
“ee
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for EV professionals.

Tech Spotlight

  • Why high-power EV charging is pushing control integration into one ECU
  • Designing safety into the cell: The case for system-level solid-state batteries
More Tech Spotlight

Featured Contributions

  • How do two-level and three-level inverter topologies compare in EVs?
  • Inside the development of the Megawatt Charging Standard
  • How does fault-tolerant control keep an EV operating after a sensor failure?
  • Q&A: How EV architectures are changing high-speed connectivity
  • How to catch EV faults before they become failures
More Featured Contributions

EV TECH TOOLBOX

“ee
Explore the EV Engineering Tech Toolboxes: a collection of high-impact articles that break down the latest EV design trends and technologies. Download to stay aligned with today’s evolving EV design challenges.

Learning Center

EE Learning Center

Sponsored Content

  • Converting custom materials for EV applications
  • Advantech Powers Versatile Electric Vehicle Charging Systems

EV Training Days

ev
Q&A
EV Engineering & Infrastructure
  • 5G Technology
  • Analog IC Tips
  • Battery Power Tips
  • Connector Tips
  • EDABoard Forums
  • Electro-Tech-Online Forums
  • Engineer’s Garage
  • Microcontroller Tips
  • Power Electronic Tips
  • Sensor Tips
  • Test and Measurement Tips
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 Arrowfly LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Arrowfly
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search EV Engineering & Infrastructure

  • News
  • Articles
    • Q&As
    • Tech Spotlight
  • Batteries
  • Charging
    • Wireless Charging
    • Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G)
  • Electrification
  • Testing and Safety
  • Learn
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Toolboxes
    • Webinars
  • Resources
    • Digital Editions
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Voices
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe