Vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology turns an electric vehicle (EV) from an electrical load into a potential energy resource. Sending power back to the grid, however, requires more than a bidirectional charger. The vehicle and charging system must coordinate power conversion while meeting grid interconnection requirements.
Broader V2G deployment also requires engineers to consider how these systems respond to changes in communications and grid conditions.
To discuss the engineering behind V2G, we spoke with Russell Vare, VP of vehicle-grid integration (VGI) at The Mobility House. In this Q&A, Vare discusses how bidirectional power flows between the vehicle and grid and what it takes to integrate V2G into existing electrical infrastructure.
Here’s what he has to say…
Where does the DC-to-AC conversion occur in this deployment, and what drove that architecture choice?
All of these systems are DC-V2G, meaning the power conversion happens at the bidirectional charging station. The primary reason for this architecture is that it reflects what is currently available on the market for bidirectional vehicles.
One driver is the existing interconnection rules for distributed energy resources (DERs), which require compliance with established standards. Today, that interconnection pathway is built around the bidirectional charging station.
New standards are now being published to support AC-V2G, where the power conversion occurs onboard the vehicle rather than at the charging station. This approach requires specialized equipment and vehicle certification, but these options are beginning to enter the market.

In DC-V2G systems, the bidirectional charging station handles power conversion between the vehicle battery and the home or grid. New AC-V2G standards shift that conversion onboard the vehicle.
Which standards govern the bidirectional power path, and where are custom interfaces still required?
Multiple standards enable the flow of electricity from a vehicle battery to the grid. Between the EV and the charging station, most vehicles use ISO 15118, which governs communication between EVs and charging infrastructure. However, some vehicles still use SAE J2847/2 for V2G communication, custom implementations, or, in the case of the Nissan LEAF, CHAdeMO.
Between the charging station and the charge management system (backend cloud), commercial fleet charging primarily uses the Open Charge Point Protocol (OCPP), while residential systems currently rely on custom implementations.
What thermal load does sustained export place on the battery pack while the vehicle is parked, and which parts of the cooling system remain active?
This varies by vehicle manufacturer and is difficult to generalize. However, it’s worth noting that the power rating for residential bidirectional chargers is typically relatively low. For example, the Kia EV9 is available with either a 76 or 99 kWh battery and is compatible with the Wallbox Quasar 2, which provides up to 12.4 kW of power. The resulting C-rate is relatively low, especially when compared with DC fast charging.
How is exported energy counted against battery throughput, and what state-of-charge window is used during a dispatch event?
The state-of-charge (SOC) window for V2G is initially defined by the vehicle manufacturer and can then be adjusted by the customer based on personal preference. For example, a manufacturer may set 20% SOC as the minimum limit, while a customer may choose to increase that limit to 40% to account for unplanned trips.
Filed Under: Charging, Featured Contributions, Q&As, Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G)

